|
PCplod Posts: 759 Joined: 2011-10-13 |
#22914 Posted on: 30.01.2012 17:16:08
So is the 2550K just the same as a 2500K but with the on board graphics locked and overclocks better? That warrents a small price increase I spose, not everyone uses on board graphics, or really needs it, seems like a good choice for gamers. |
|
Suicidal Zebra Moderator Posts: 400 Joined: 2010-11-15 |
#22916 Posted on: 30.01.2012 18:02:57
We should stress, the 2550K *may* overclock to higher frequencies. Unfortunately there's no way of knowing without gathering the results of buyers vs current users of the 2500K. Personally, I wish they had called it the 2500KP, given it the same multiplier and turbo as the 2500K, and sold it at around the same price as the vanilla 2500. The way they have done it just causes more customer confusion, and I'd wager the retailers are more than a little miffed too. |
|
Helios1234 Moderator Posts: 2570 Joined: 2009-02-17 |
#22924 Posted on: 30.01.2012 22:22:01
The 2550K's multi is increased by 1 compared to the 2500K. The problem is that they can't name it the 2600K which also shares it clock speed but it still requires a higher nomenclature due to its clock speed. I imagine they never thought they would be marketing this CPU eventually hence the rather strange choice they opted for in the end. |
|
Clockwise Moderator Posts: 34 Joined: 2012-01-05 |
#22931 Posted on: 31.01.2012 00:33:45
Confusion is always good... |